Long header: Each pages' content is found below, scroll down
MATHEWS STREET, AMERICA
A voice of We The Posterity
Keeping possession and title as JUSTICE and the SUPREME LAW DICTATES,
of our four generations' family home and this matriarch's entire material well-being
is now in the hands and hearts of our justices at California First District Court of Appeals
Further
links to the right can be found underlined
Our family closed a valid proven loan for $850,000 PROOF OF FINANCING DELIVERED
in 2019 on a refinance amount of about $690,000 total loan payoff due
for our family home in ongoing lawful possession and dwelling of 60 years continually since 1965
and delivered written proof of funds and financing to mortgage servicer collection attorneys representing Nationstar Mortgage and Wilmington Trust, transferred by Bank of America.
Our reputable hard money loan agent requested bank wiring instructions to wire
MY UNCONDITIONAL OFFER OF FULL PAYOFF FUNDS,
ON THE FULLY APPROVED HARD MONEY LOAN AND OPEN ESCROW AT TITLE COMPANY
for a property assessed by the Lender $1.3 Mil. as is, being UNDER 55% LTV (loan-to-value)
in a hot rental and seller's market location with written proof of two competing lenders' offers.
​
"Where are we sending your money and what is the exact dollar amount demand for my lawful right to redeem our owner-occupied family home since 1965 and pay your claim in full ??
HERE IS MY UNCONDITIONAL OFFER ATTORNEYS:
WE HAVE YOUR WRITTEN AGREEMENT YOU SENT IN TWO WEEKS AGO
ACCEPTING MY OFFER SO WE HAVE A WRITTEN CONTRACT AND MEETING OF THE MINDS IN WRITING: YOU EXPECT "PAYMENT IN FULL" INSTEAD OF HOLD FORECLOSURE SALE ON OUR HOME, WHICH WOULD BE UNLAWFUL AT THIS TIME.
​
I AM REFINANCING YOUR LOAN WITH NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION NOR PROOF OF CLAIM REQUESTED OF YOUR CLIENT, AND HAVE DELIVERED TO YOUR ATTORNEY PROOF OF FINANCING IN WRITING PER YOUR ATTORNEY'S WRITTEN CONTRACT
PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR EXACT DEMAND IN DOLLARS AND CENTS AND
BANK WIRING INSTRUCTIONS.
​
FINANCING IS COMPLETE AND YOUR FUNDS ARE WIRE-TRANSFER-READY!"​
​
The pending foreclosure sale is now mandated for cancellation by law -
and we respectfully expect your written cancellation of the security instrument, THANK YOU.
per California Homeowners' Bill of Rights."
​
​
"Homeowners Right of Redemption" is well-established law in all fifty states
redeems the home by full payoff refinance of the debt secured by the home.​
​
​​
​
​
​
​​​​
​
Armed sheriffs of my own County evicted us on July 23, 2024, executing on the lawless unconstitutional order
of an improper class of proceeding in California
which denies due process before dispossession of property
from the owner of her occupied dwelling and domain,
using an eviction process designed for landlord-tenant disputes,
in which there is no capacity of this "court" to apply
constitutional due process rights to homeowner standing
whatsoever.
​(scroll down past long header to BLOG article here)
​
​​
​
Wedgewood Inc, a huge fix n flip operation w/ subsidiaries Breckenridge and Champery
WERE WARNED WITH ACTUAL NOTICE AT THE SALE BY HOMEOWNER FOR 45 MINUTES
WEDGEWOOD et al UTTERLY FAIL LEGAL STANDING AS ANY "BONAFIDE PURCHASER"
​
All we are requesting of our court as PLAINTIFF in our ACTIVE WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE SUIT
Alameda County Superior Court regular unlimited case, is for CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL BY JURY
and not Summary Judgement on failed fraud-ridden papers only, due process denied, our only home title and and possession awarded by our own county courthouse, to the
NON bonafide purchaser, at the law-violating illegal sale, Actual-Noticed Wedgwood.
Who should be subject to sworn testimony, fact witnesses, admissible evidence at TRIAL.
​
​
OUR HOME SITS EMPTY AND WE ARE LOCKED OUT OF OUR DWELLING
ALL WHILE ON APPEAL OF THE CASE WE FILED FOR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE
​
​WEDGWOOD, LLC BID ON OUR HOME BUT THEY ALSO BOUGHT INTO A LAWSUIT. WEDGEWOOD IS NOT A BONA FIDE PURCHASER
BUT THE EVIDENCE PROVING THIS HAS BEEN OBSTRUCTED AND / OR IGNORED SO FAR
BY THE POWERS THAT BE .​
MAXIM OF LAW: "No wrong should suffer for want of a remedy."
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
​
Jesus Christ the LORD is commandeering a current controversy and its resolution
to the question of lawful possession by Rule of Law
to the inviolable asylum of our family home
of four generations and 60 years.
​
The Ramos Yamagishi family comes in honor and in truth:
WE DO NOT CONSENT TO LEGALIZED PLUNDER.
​
​​
​
We the People do not consent to the widespread and lawless scourge
ransacked upon millions of American families
WHO ENDURE TRAUMATIC FRAUDCLOSURE AND GUNPOINT HOMELESSNESS.
​
We the People are sick and tired of being abused, slandered and lied about,
deceived and then decimated out of our most basic house and home:
a theft of indecent inhumane violence against the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God,
when a true, lawful and logical remedy for all interested parties lies within reach and reason.
​​
​
Any person or entity who shows up at these nonjudicial private foreclosure auctions
with a cashier's check in hand and signatory powers just for that transaction
can and sometimes do move vast sums of money by cash-of-unknown-origins
now transformed into a lien on a California family's home and shelter,
no matter the level of fraudulent documents or procedures leading to the auctioneers cry.
That lien then is enforced for eviction in an unconstitutional process in California
known as Unlawful Detainer, designed to evict tenants on behalf of landlords:
Post-auction we California homeowners, therefore, are seen and heard in OUR OWN COURTROOMS AS THE EQUIVALENT LEGAL STATUS AS MERE TENANTS
who refuse to vacate the property owners' real estate.
​
​​
We the People do not consent to government who legalizes this plunder
or who may knowingly or unknowingly be complicit in giving aid and comfort
to this above-described enemy of We the People.​​​​
​
Our elected and appointed officials have failed to defend and protect us.
Our courts have failed to effectuate justice
when Due Process is routinely denied before dispossession of property
No trial by jury of our peers, but instead by "summary judgement " on papers spouting untruths
​
LANDLORD-TENANT "UNLAWFUL DETAINER" COURT LACKS
SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO ADJUDICATE A HOMEOWNER'S INJURIES .
Rogue opinions and illogical procedures tragically trample Rule of Law, at great harm.
​​
Our county sheriffs and law enforcement defer to these courts
whose orders are unconstitutional violations of oaths of office
where our appeals for a more well-reasoned judgement
fall on deaf ears and lead to dead-end hallways.
Even when we appeal a wrongful judgement to a higher court
and duly motion for protection by their own statutes
Our protectors are no more -- all three branches of local government abandon us
And instead give place to plunderers, against all Right and Reason.
​​
​​
​
We therefore speak a Statement of Grievances
of deeply damaging violations wrought upon ourselves and our families,
our elders, our children, our sick and frail-- those without a voice and then without a home.
​
Now that we have battled years against a many-headed Foreclosure Machine
We have been battered and badly bruised but we know the nature of this beast:
Which must trample people no more --- and Supreme Law of our Land instead prevail.
​
​
We come in peace, honor, truth and lawful reason
for Reform, Restitution, Reconciliation, and Rehousing
​​​
​
_edited.jpg)



LITIGATION PENDING and Lis Pendens on record active May 2023
Alameda County Title Records - County Clerk Recorders' Office
WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE LAWSUIT
RENEE SHIZUE RAMOS (aka RENEE YAMAGISHI) vs. WILMINGTON TRUST, WEDGEWOOD INC., BRECKENRIDGE, CHAMPERY, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE , AZTEC FORECLOSURE CORP.
& Does 1-100, et al.
Alameda County Superior Court Case # 23CV029813
Stay pending our proper timely-filed appeal was unjustifiably denied
Homeowner appealed summary judgement after court denial of trial on the merits, no sworn testimonies, no review of admissible evidence, no depositions nor meaningful discovery: APPEALED to California First District Court of Appeals Case #A170664
NOTICE: Any person or entity who attempts to show, sell, convey,
transfer, buy, purchase or take or claim any form of interest
in this property i.e. our family home for 60 years continually since 1965, shall force themselves added as additional Defendant(s) and Respondent(s) to the ongoing litigation and controversy at Law.
CA Dept of Real Estate has been notified: MLS listing is improper.


March 7, 2023 We remain peacefully in lawful possession of our home, and will continue to defend our rights, the truth and a just remedy to wrongs suffered, to the fullest extent of the law.
3/7/2023
For clarity: we have ONLY ONE ACTIVE CASE at this time --- the "eviction action" in which Renee Ramos Yamagishi is the named defendant and appellant, Homeowner Peacably Remaining in Lawful Possession, as the controversy continues in just this single case, in an administrative eviction court designed originally for landlord-tenant matters, since October 2019 when the complaint was filed.
Homeowner has NOT YET FILED an action in the proper classification of the court system, against several potential defendants -- not for lack of grave injuries caused by their knowing and deliberate obstruction of homeowner's right to REDEEM by unconditional tender of full payoff which they REJECTED; but for several strategic reasons. Additionally, "UD Courts" don't allow Cross Complaints filed by defendants. In either case and before any court, our stance is that the foreclosure auction sale itself was and is void by operation of law.
​
See "Right Here at Home" page above for background history.
​
January 11, 2023 Appellate Panel of the limited division of county court denied our appeal and denied rehearing, upholding summary judgement of the trial court to enforce a writ of eviction. IN THE APPEAL WE PLED VOID ASSIGNMENT and PLED NOTHING OF HOMEOWNER'S REDEMPTION WILLFULLY OBSTRUCTED. Because this "limited case unlawful detainer" proceeding lacks capacity to try that complex title issue -- it belongs in a higher court. In the trial court this self-represented homeowner pled ONLY Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, offering some factual background for informational context illustration only.
​
The limitations built-into the "limited classfication" defined by both unconstitutional statutes passed in California legislature and in practice in the courts themselves, for administering eviction cases against California homeowners certainly do show up with unacceptable limits. We petition to higher authorities.
​
​
December 12, 2022 Pending is our Petition for Rehearing in Appellate Division of the Alameda County Superior Court, Limited Classification of cases "unlawful detainer court." A county-wide moratorium on evictions remains in place for tenants who are my housemates here so there is no immediate threat of dispossession. ​