top of page

Long header: Each pages' content is found below, scroll down

MATHEWS STREET, AMERICA

A voice of We The Posterity

Keeping possession and title as JUSTICE and the SUPREME LAW DICTATES,

of our four generations' family home and this matriarch's entire material well-being

is now in the hands and hearts of our justices at California First District Court of Appeals

Further

links to the right can be found underlined

Our family closed a valid proven loan for $850,000 PROOF OF FINANCING DELIVERED

in 2019 on a refinance amount of about $690,000 total loan payoff due

for our family home in ongoing lawful possession and dwelling of 60 years continually since 1965

and delivered written proof of funds and financing to mortgage servicer collection attorneys representing Nationstar Mortgage and Wilmington Trust, transferred by Bank of America.

Our reputable hard money loan agent requested bank wiring instructions to wire

MY UNCONDITIONAL OFFER OF FULL PAYOFF FUNDS,

ON THE FULLY APPROVED HARD MONEY LOAN AND OPEN ESCROW AT TITLE COMPANY

for a property assessed by the Lender $1.3 Mil. as is, being UNDER 55% LTV (loan-to-value)

in a hot rental and seller's market location with written proof of two competing lenders' offers.

"Where are we sending your money and what is the exact dollar amount demand for my lawful right to redeem our owner-occupied family home since 1965 and pay your claim in full ??

HERE IS MY UNCONDITIONAL OFFER ATTORNEYS:

WE HAVE YOUR WRITTEN AGREEMENT YOU SENT IN TWO WEEKS AGO

ACCEPTING MY OFFER SO WE HAVE A WRITTEN CONTRACT AND MEETING OF THE MINDS IN WRITING: YOU EXPECT "PAYMENT IN FULL" INSTEAD OF HOLD FORECLOSURE SALE ON OUR HOME, WHICH WOULD BE UNLAWFUL AT THIS TIME.

I AM REFINANCING YOUR LOAN WITH NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION NOR PROOF OF CLAIM REQUESTED OF YOUR CLIENT, AND HAVE DELIVERED TO YOUR ATTORNEY PROOF OF FINANCING IN WRITING PER YOUR ATTORNEY'S WRITTEN CONTRACT

PLEASE PROVIDE YOUR EXACT DEMAND IN DOLLARS AND CENTS AND

BANK WIRING INSTRUCTIONS.

FINANCING IS COMPLETE AND YOUR FUNDS ARE WIRE-TRANSFER-READY!"

The pending foreclosure sale is now mandated for cancellation by law -

and we respectfully expect your written cancellation of the security instrument, THANK YOU.

per California Homeowners' Bill of Rights."

"Homeowners Right of Redemption" is well-established law in all fifty states

redeems the home by full payoff refinance of the debt secured by the home.

ILLEGAL FORECLOSURE SALE PROCEEDED IN WILLFUL AND DELIBERATE MISCONDUCT OF CIV 2924.11b2 et al., by lawyers of mortgage debt collector.

Armed sheriffs of my own County evicted us on July 23, 2024, executing on the lawless unconstitutional order

of an improper class of proceeding in California

which denies due process before dispossession of property

from the owner of her occupied dwelling and domain,

using an eviction process designed for landlord-tenant disputes,

in which there is no capacity of this "court" to apply

constitutional due process rights to homeowner standing

whatsoever.

(scroll down past long header to BLOG article here)

Wedgewood Inc, a huge fix n flip operation w/ subsidiaries Breckenridge and Champery

WERE WARNED WITH ACTUAL NOTICE AT THE SALE BY HOMEOWNER FOR 45 MINUTES

WEDGEWOOD et al UTTERLY FAIL LEGAL STANDING AS ANY "BONAFIDE PURCHASER"

All we are requesting of our court as PLAINTIFF in our ACTIVE WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE SUIT

Alameda County Superior Court regular unlimited case, is for CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL BY JURY

and not Summary Judgement on failed fraud-ridden papers only, due process denied, our only home title and and possession awarded by our own county courthouse, to the

NON bonafide purchaser, at the law-violating illegal sale, Actual-Noticed Wedgwood.

Who should be subject to sworn testimony, fact witnesses, admissible evidence at TRIAL.

OUR HOME SITS EMPTY AND WE ARE LOCKED OUT OF OUR DWELLING

ALL WHILE ON APPEAL OF THE CASE WE FILED FOR WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE

WEDGWOOD, LLC BID ON OUR HOME BUT THEY ALSO BOUGHT INTO A LAWSUIT. WEDGEWOOD IS NOT A BONA FIDE PURCHASER

BUT THE EVIDENCE PROVING THIS HAS BEEN OBSTRUCTED AND / OR IGNORED SO FAR

BY THE POWERS THAT BE .

MAXIM OF LAW: "No wrong should suffer for want of a remedy."

Jesus Christ the LORD is commandeering a current controversy and its resolution

to the question of lawful possession by Rule of Law

to the inviolable asylum of our family home

of four generations and 60 years.

The Ramos Yamagishi family comes in honor and in truth:

WE DO NOT CONSENT TO LEGALIZED PLUNDER.

We the People do not consent to the widespread and lawless scourge

ransacked upon millions of American families

WHO ENDURE TRAUMATIC FRAUDCLOSURE AND GUNPOINT HOMELESSNESS.

We the People are sick and tired of being abused, slandered and lied about,

deceived and then decimated out of our most basic house and home:

a theft of indecent inhumane violence against the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God,

when a true, lawful and logical remedy for all interested parties lies within reach and reason.

Any person or entity who shows up at these nonjudicial private foreclosure auctions

with a cashier's check in hand and signatory powers just for that transaction

can and sometimes do move vast sums of money by cash-of-unknown-origins

now transformed into a lien on a California family's home and shelter,

no matter the level of fraudulent documents or procedures leading to the auctioneers cry.

That lien then is enforced for eviction in an unconstitutional process in California

known as Unlawful Detainer, designed to evict tenants on behalf of landlords:

Post-auction we California homeowners, therefore, are seen and heard in OUR OWN COURTROOMS AS THE EQUIVALENT LEGAL STATUS AS MERE TENANTS

who refuse to vacate the property owners' real estate.

We the People do not consent to government who legalizes this plunder

or who may knowingly or unknowingly be complicit in giving aid and comfort

to this above-described enemy of We the People.

Our elected and appointed officials have failed to defend and protect us.

Our courts have failed to effectuate justice

when Due Process is routinely denied before dispossession of property

No trial by jury of our peers, but instead by "summary judgement " on papers spouting untruths

LANDLORD-TENANT "UNLAWFUL DETAINER" COURT LACKS

SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION TO ADJUDICATE A HOMEOWNER'S INJURIES .

Rogue opinions and illogical procedures tragically trample Rule of Law, at great harm.

Our county sheriffs and law enforcement defer to these courts

whose orders are unconstitutional violations of oaths of office

where our appeals for a more well-reasoned judgement

fall on deaf ears and lead to dead-end hallways.

Even when we appeal a wrongful judgement to a higher court

and duly motion for protection by their own statutes

Our protectors are no more -- all three branches of local government abandon us

And instead give place to plunderers, against all Right and Reason.

We therefore speak a Statement of Grievances

of deeply damaging violations wrought upon ourselves and our families,

our elders, our children, our sick and frail-- those without a voice and then without a home.

Now that we have battled years against a many-headed Foreclosure Machine

We have been battered and badly bruised but we know the nature of this beast:

Which must trample people no more --- and Supreme Law of our Land instead prevail.

We come in peace, honor, truth and lawful reason

for Reform, Restitution, Reconciliation, and Rehousing

Screen Shot 2023-10-01 at 9.27.00 PM.jpeg

Screen Shot 2023-01-25 at 6.09.51 PM.jpeg

LITIGATION PENDING and Lis Pendens on record active May 2023
Alameda County Title Records - County Clerk Recorders' Office

WRONGFUL FORECLOSURE LAWSUIT
RENEE SHIZUE RAMOS (aka RENEE YAMAGISHI) vs. WILMINGTON TRUST, WEDGEWOOD INC., BRECKENRIDGE, CHAMPERY, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE , AZTEC FORECLOSURE CORP.
& Does 1-100, et al.

Alameda County Superior Court Case # 23CV029813
Stay pending our proper timely-filed appeal was unjustifiably denied

Homeowner appealed summary judgement after court denial of trial on the merits, no sworn testimonies, no review of admissible evidence, no depositions nor meaningful discovery: APPEALED to California First District Court of Appeals Case #A170664

NOTICE: Any person or entity who attempts to show, sell, convey,
transfer, buy, purchase or take or claim any form of interest
in this property i.e. our family home for 60 years continually since 1965, shall force themselves added as additional Defendant(s) and Respondent(s) to the ongoing litigation and controversy at Law.

CA Dept of Real Estate has been notified: MLS listing is improper.

https://x.com/ReneeShizue

Search

POSTPONED to May 23, 2017 - breaking news: the foreclosure postponement dance continues ... it look

Renee Ramos Yamagishi

Apr 17, 20171 min read

What my adversaries don't know is I've learned to dance to my own music and they are poor shots anyway. [THOSE are your paper trail "proofs" you have the right to do this??? So ... no. You've been sued.]

Today after emailing and phone calling and all the other prayerful guerrilla-lawyering we in the trenches do .... the "wear-them-down-til-they-break" method of postponing auction dates every 30 days just did one of its moves which is to wait to just before D-Day and "postpone" the auction another 30 days out. For years. Welcome to my world.

This gives time for some HOPED-FOR meaningful dialogue between myself as Pro Per litigant and Nationstar's lawyers at Severson & Werson. We march on.

Yesterday the status was this: So far, even with active litigation and proof of service, opposing counsel and Nattionstar Mortgage LLC have not cancelled a scheduled foreclosure auction for April 25, 2017 at the Alameda County Courthouse steps, so therefore I mustPlead for Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) on Tuesday April 18, 2017 at 3:00 pm, Superior Court of CA - Alameda County, 1221 Oak St., Oakland CA, YAMAGISHI v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, et al., in Judge Victoria Kolakowski's Court, Dept23. Will the court order stop to foreclosure auction in favor of a next hearing for Nationstar's attorneys to argue why they should be allowed to carry it out even while they've been sued in court alleging that for Nationtar to do so would be unlawful and subject to damages and serious counterclaims.

bottom of page